State insolvency, escalating public protest, the new coalition cabinet is instrumental for the pacted transition
Following intraparty conflicts in SDS, its parliamentary party fraction erodes and the supporter party DPS becomes ambivalent seeking a new format of parliamentary majority
BSP encourages the resignation of the PM anticipating electoral victory and single-party majority in the next parliament - this contradicts to the position of coalition partners NI and DPS which continue to support the cabinet; the move is supported by and coordinated with the parliamentary opposition (SDS)
cabinet appointed by president (discretionary power), the parliament is dissolved
State insolvency, escalating public protest, intraparty conflicts in the governing BSP leading to voluntary resignation of PM and simultaneous change in party leadership
Following intraparty conflicts in NDSV the parliamentary party fraction splits and on 10.03.2004 a new parliamentary group of NV was formed. In February 2005 coalition partner DPS being in policy conflict with NDSV utilizes the situation by dismissing a deputy PM and blocking the privatization of Bulgartabac
Public protests erupted in early 2013 throughout the country mostly focused on high energy prices, the monopoly over energy provision and other social concerns. Following some violent clashes with the police, Borissov submitted the resignation of the Cabinet in February 2013
Public protests against Oresharski cabinet continued for a year. European Parliament elections on 12 May 2014 showed a dramatic decrease in the support of the leading coalition party (BSP) and the supporting party (ATAKA).The small coalition partner (DPS), which almost doubled its results demanded early elections obviously intending to play a swing-party role in the next parliament. BSP had no means to oppose DPS as a banking crisis erupted, allegedly caused by a disreputable DPS politician. The PM regardless of being a BSP nominee took the DPS side and early elections became inevitable.
The increasing economic problems, tension and conflicts within the coalition after the scandal with founding of ODS was discovered in autumn 1997 led to internal crisis. KDU-CSL and ODA left the coalition. The cabinet resigned on 30. November 1997 and continue as cabinet in resignation until the new Tošovský cabinet was appointed on 2 January 1998
A nonrecurring constitutional bill passed, stating that the electoral term of the Chamber of Deputies was going to end by the date of early elections held on 30th June 1998
The KDU-CSL ministers left the government, after unsuccessful pressure of the party for a replacement of PM Gross. The reason for that were PM's personal financial unclearnesses, as funding of apartment purchase or unclear credit for purchase of real estate by the Prime Minister wife
Resignation of PM Gross, enabling continuation of previous coalition formula (Gross I)
On 24.3.2009 vote of confidence was held in the Chamber of Deputies, initiated by the opposition parties ČSSD and KSCM, and the Chamber expressed no confidence. It was first government in the history of the Czech Republic which was overthrown by the vote of non-confidence. There were 101 MPs for the non-confidence expression, 96 MPs against.  In addition to all deputies from opposition ČSSD  (71) and KSCM (26) voted against the government also two rebels from ODS Vlastimil Tlustý and Jan Schwippel and two former deputies for SZ - Vera Jakubková and Olga Zubová.
On the 3rd April 2012, the leaders of VV announced that their ministers will leave the government by the 1st May. However, one day later all 3 ministers of VV (2 of them are not MPs) led by deputy prime minister Karolina Peake announced that they refused to resign. On the 17th April Peake stated that she was leaving VV and was establishing a new fraction called LIDEM, which is meant to support the Nečas cabinet. In the following days she succeeded in gaining support from 7 other VV MPs, who consequently left the PPG of VV. The LIDEM fraction officially turned to become a party on the 29th May 2012, when it was registered by the Ministry of Interior as a political party
PM Petr Nečas resigned on 17.6. 2013 after his closest co-worker, the Managing Director of the Section of the PM Jana Nagyova was put under arrest and accused of misuse of the Millitary Intelligence Agency which should be following up Nečas’ wife. The police also suspects Nagyova of corruption behaviour consisting in organizing high-profile posts in state-owned enterprises for three former ODS factioning MP`s who opposed the state budget bill and later have voluntarily resigned on their MP mandate and so enabled that the Nečas cabinet bill on state budget was passed. The arrest of Nagyova was a part of a larger anti-corruption police operation and included prosecution of former MPs, Military Intelligence officials and influential businessmen suspect of manipulating state tenders
An investiture vote not passed. However cabinet stayed in office till appointment of new cabinet formed after early elections
The coalition was undergoing a crisis due to unclear property relations of the Deputy Prime Minister,  Minister of Finance and President of the ANO Movement Andrey Babis. The weakening positions of Prime Minister and Chairman of CSSD S. Sobotka. In June 2017 he resigned as chairman of the party but remained PM.
Laar's Fatherland coalition of proto-parties started to crumble in mid-1993 and by 1994 there was open opposition to his leadership. Things came to a head, when it was revealed that Laar had lied about turning over 1.4 billion Soviet rubles to the Chechen govt in exchange for dollars. A motion of no-confidence was tabled on September 26, 1994 and quickly passed by a margin on 60-27
In fall 1995 KE leader Edgar Savisaar was revealed to have secretly tape recorded conversation he had with other politicians during coalition negotiations, causing PM Vähi to ask President Meri to fire him, which the President did. After that, Vähi decided also to resign the cabinet
When after local elections in Nov 1996, Vähi's EK decided to form a coalition in the Tallinn City Council with the Center Party, his national partner, ER, decided to leave the coalition in protest
Vähi's personal resignation came after it was revealed that while serving as mayor of Tallinn in the mid-1990s he had acquired some apartments in the old town for a fraction of their real value
The coalition had bickered over several issues, but when Laar's IL was unable to convince ER about the need for local government reform, Laar called it quits
Justice Minister Ken-Marti Vaher lost a no-confidence vote, upon which Parts announced that his coalition was over. The defeat was essentially vis-a-vis Parts and ResP, and less so against the cabinet as a whole, since one of the coalition members, ER, defected and voted against Vaher, thereby signaling its overall disillusionment with the coalition
Ansip threw out the SDE ministers over disputes concerning unemployment benefits and budgetary constraints. Ansip wanted to reduce benefits and raise payroll taxes, which the SDE objected to, until Ansip had President Ilves remove them from his cabinet
Ansip resigned to stand for the European Parliament and become EU Commissioner
The FKGP left the coalition on 24.02.1992
The PM challenged the coalition partner with his nomination to a portfolio (after a less successful electoral performance at the EP elections)
Removal of a minister from the area of the coalition partner plus loss of confidence in PM after his leaked speech on false campaign promises
The aim was to hand over the Prime Ministership to someone who is accepted by MSzP and SzDSz alike. Also the PM was unpopular and the economic crisis hit the country
Insufficient govt. support to farming; LC vs LZS
Environmental Protection and Regional Development
Coalition parties agreed to get rid of non-partisan PM; Šķēle vs all coalition parties
Rejected budget; TP defected from coalition
Pressure against JL leader Repše; JL vs TP and LPP
TP left coalition on eve of elections citing economic policy differences
Collapse of a supermarket building in Rīga
The immediate cause of cabinet termination was the case called "Macierewicz (Internal Affairs Minister) envelope". It was a list of 80 names secret collaborators of Ministry of Internal Affairs
PSL, UD, KLD, PPPP, KPN, PC, ZChN, PL, S
Head of the Economic Committee of the Council of Ministers
Head of the Social Committee of the Council of Ministers
The government collapsed because of a series of protests of trade unions. On May 28, 1993 the Sejm passed by a majority of one vote of no confidence for the Suchocka cabinet. On May 29, 1993 President Lech Walesa did not accept the resignation of the  Suchocka cabinet and dissolved parliament
17/10/1992 "Small Constitution", constructive vote of no-confidence was optional
The cabinet of Prime Minister Waldemar Pawlak resigned on March 1, 1995, as a result of disputes between the coalition partners (the controversy surrounding the methods of work of  Prime Minister Pawlak), personal crises and the policies of President Lech Walesa. SLD withdrew the support for PM Pawlak
The cabinet of Prime Minister Jozef Oleksy resigned on January 26, 1996, because the Military Prosecutor's Office opened an investigation against the charges against the prime minister (allegation of spying for Russia)
Labour and Social Policy since 19.10.1999
Disintegration of the coalition because of a conflict about the management of the City of Warsaw (Warsaw city coalition and the position of mayor)
Conflict within the coalition on the law on biofuels and charges for the use of motorways
The fall of the cabinet followed the series of scandals within SLD (e.g. Rywingate), resignation of PM
/Labour and Social Policy since 24.11.2004
Too much public support for Marcinkiewicz (threat to the PiS leader J. Kaczynski)
Disintegration of the coalition as a result of the so-called land scandal
Tusk's resignation after being elected President of the European Council
Miners' rampage on Bucharest combined with conflict over policies between PM and President (both from the same party)
PSD, PNTCD, PAC, PUNR, PSM, PSDR, PL93, PNLCD, PDL
Minority cabinet searching for a more stable parliamentary majority
Conflict over policies (bilateral treaty with Hungary) plus proximity of legislative elections (parties need to distance themselves from the government
Major cabinet reshuffle (cabinet asks for renewed confidence; as a side effect, one minor party loses its cabinet seat)
"Either him or me" - part 1: conflict between PM and one cabinet member triggered by/combined with conflict over policies
PNTCD, coalition parties (PM vs coalition)
"Either him or the coalition" - part 2: PM undesired by almost all coalition parties, was forced to resign; PDL to come back in cabinet
One party leaves the cabinet and the coalition - unhappy with the policies of the cabinet
PNTCD, coalition parties (PM vs President)
PM "revoked" by the President; PM forced to resign as he lost the trust of the coalition parties
One party (PSDR) forms a new coalition with main opposition party, is therefore excluded from cabinet
Coalition between PSD and PC breaks, PC excluded from cabinet
Major tensions between coalition parties has led to exclusion of one party from the cabinet (minority cabinet gets the confidence of the parliament with the help of the major opposition party
Conflict over personnel (revocation by PDL of the PSD Minister of Interior)
PM decided to resign: his government has become increasingly unpopular
Break-up of the governing coalition (PNL leaves the cabinet)
Presidential elections have forced UDMR to leave the cabinet (Hungarians voted overwehlmingly against the PM who also also a runnerup in the presidential elections)
SNS stopped supporting the cabinet, the only member of the cabinet from SNS left the government
The government was terminated after ĽS-HZDS signed the coalition agreement with SNS
After the annual speech of the President about the state of the Republic, a group of MPs left ĽS-HZDS, few days later in vote of no-confidence, the government failed
President popularly elected from 1998, and appoints formateur, however parties easily can overcome this appointment.
After the dismissal of Pavol Rusko (Chairman of ANO), the coalition has ended
KDH left the coalition after the coalition parties rejected the Agreement with the Vatican
The government did not succeed in vote of no confidence, since the vote was held together with the vote on EFSF, and SaS abstained on the vote, thus the government did not gain the confidence of the parliament
PM and the coalition government was subject of vote of no confidence. Conflict was over privatization of state property and the way how previous economic system should be deconstructed and ideological issues as well
Government coalition mandate was ended by regular Parliamentary election
One of political parties (SDS) left the coalition. Withdrawal of SDS in 1996 was a consequence of dismissal of Janez Janša as a disagreement with his politics which presupposes rather high degree of autonomy of military security service. He was accused of its abuse in political purposes
One of political parties (SD) left the coalition. PM demanded from minister of economy, who was a member of SD, to resign due to incorrectness related to state funding. He refused and since PM persisted on his demand, SD left the coalition
PM and the coalition government was subject of vote of confidence.  One of the coalition parties, namely SLS, left the coalition and united with SKD, which was at the time in opposition. SKD conditioned their union with SLS was that SLS left the coalition. As a consequence political crisis outburst.  New candidates for ministers, proposed by PM in order to end the political crisis, was motions of vote of confidence
PM ran for the President of Republic of Slovenia and won
One of political parties (SLS) left the coalition. According to an interview with one very influential member of SLS, the party was pushed away from the most important coalition decision
One of political parties (DeSUS) left the coalition. Disagreement over implementation of pension policy
One of political parties (Zares) left the coalition. Zares demanded from PM to propose reconstruction of government. Since this did not take place, Zares left the coalition
PM and the coalition government was subject of vote of confidence which led to early Parliamentary election. The cause was general belief that the PM and the parties which still persist in coalition are no longer capable of governing and facing the economic crisis. New candidates for ministers, proposed by PM in order to end the political crisis, was motions of vote of confidence
One political party (DL) left the coalition after the Commission for the Prevention of Corruption publically announced that the Prime Minister Janez Janša systematically and repeatedly violated the law by failing to properly report his assets, yet the Prime Minister refused to step down to preserve the coalition government
PM and the coalition government was subject of vote of no confidence
The cabinet was terminated due to resignation of the PM, which was caused by the split in the biggest governmental party over the leadership position (in the PS)